(Via Boing Boing) A Viennese art group called netznetz has decided to use a "reputation system" to decide how it will distribute the grant money it receives from the local government. The aim is to encourage collaboration among the grantee community (in this case, art and culture groups) by creating a forum and tool that will allow participants to rate each other’s work on an ongoing basis. I can see lots of potential problems in this but, all the same, it’s a fascinating experiment in dynamic peer review!
Tags:
Related Insights
By Dr. Robert Buccigrossi, TCG CIO I’m not a UX expert (we have real ones at TCG), but I watched a video breaking down some psychology principles that top designers use, and couldn’t stop thinking about how I am happily...
As reported widely, AI development tools are excelling at producing large volumes of code. But the data points to a practical limit: increases in code activity do not translate one-for-one into increases in shipped software. The chart below traces a...
By Dr. Robert Buccigrossi, TCG CTO There is a strong push by the administration for Federal agencies to adopt artificial intelligence. But how can we support this shift when AI systems are opaque and unreliable? One key is “Agentic AI”....
